Kling Image 3.0 Omni variants & parameters
| Parameter | Kling Image 3.0 Omni |
|---|---|
| Duration | — |
| Aspect ratios | 1:1 · 16:9 · 9:16 · 4:3 · 3:4 |
| Resolution | — |
| Native audio | — |
| Image-to-video | — |
| Reference-to-video | — |
| Credits per second | — |
| 5-second clip cost | 8 cr/image |
What is Kling Image 3.0 Omni?
Kling Image 3.0 Omni is the multi-reference model in Kuaishou's Kling Image 3.0 generation, the image-side sibling of the Kling video models. Its job is the hardest one in image generation: producing the same character — face, body, outfit and styling — in a new pose, place or light without the drift that single-reference workflows suffer from.
You give it up to 7 reference images in one request and describe the new shot. In the prompt you can say what each reference is for — the subject, the scene, a style or a prop — and Omni composes them into one coherent still. Two or three views of the same character from different angles are usually enough to anchor a face; add an outfit or a location reference to fix the rest. It also works as a plain text-to-image model when you have no references yet.
Five aspect ratios are available: 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 4:3 and 3:4. Output is about one megapixel — 1024 × 1024 for a square, 1664 × 936 at 16:9. Prompts are limited to 2,500 characters by the supplier.
Kling Image 3.0 Omni starts at 6 credits per image, and the exact price for the setting you choose is shown before you generate. Reference images do not add to the price.
Omni fits naturally into a character pipeline on FlyAIgh. Keep the reference set in the Characters library, generate new stills here, and carry the same idea into video with Kling V3 Omni, which takes up to 7 reference images in its own reference mode. Portraits, character art, fashion and editorial photography suit it best.
The standard Kling Image 3.0 has its own page; it is text-to-image only and starts at 4 credits, a good choice for one-off portraits and prompt iteration before you have a reference set. Kling Image is weaker than GPT Image 2.6 for in-image text and weaker than Midjourney for highly stylised illustration.
Kling Image 3.0 Omni vs Kling Image 3.0 vs Nano Banana 2.1
| Capability | Kling Image 3.0 Omni | Kling Image 3.0 | Nano Banana 2.1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Native audio | |||
| Image-to-video | |||
| Reference-to-video | |||
| First/last frame |